1.
Coffee Consumption and Cancer Risk: An Assessment of the Health Implications Based on Recent Knowledge.
Pauwels, EKJ, Volterrani, D
Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre. 2021;30(5):401-411
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Coffee is one of the most consumed beverages worldwide. Coffee is a good source of polyphenolic antioxidant and anti-inflammatory compounds such as caffeine, cafestol, kahweol, and chlorogenic acids. This review included one hundred and five cohort studies and meta-analyses to evaluate the relationship between coffee consumption and cancer of the breast, liver, oesophagus, stomach, pancreas, colorectum, kidney, bladder, prostate, and ovaries. The results of this review found an inverse association between coffee consumption and reduced risk of hepatocellular cancer. A slight risk reduction is observed against breast cancer in postmenopausal women. This review found no considerable association between coffee consumption and decreased cancer risk in other organs. Further robust studies are required to investigate the benefits of coffee consumption on cancer risk reduction due to the high heterogeneity of included studies. However, healthcare professionals can use the results of this study to understand the benefits of coffee consumption.
Abstract
A significant number of studies suggest that coffee consumption reduces cancer risk. This beneficial effect is usually ascribed to the presence of polyphenolic antioxidants and anti-inflammatory agents, including caffeine, cafestol, kahweol, and chlorogenic acids. To summarize recent literature on this subject, we performed a bibliographic search in PubMed and Embase over the period January 2005 to December 2020 to identify cohort studies and meta-analysis (with data collection ensuring quality of selected reports) that could provide quantitative data on the relationship between coffee consumption and common cancers. The totality of eligible scientific articles supports the evidence that coffee intake is inversely associated with risk of hepatocellular cancer and, to a slight extent, risk of breast cancer among postmenopausal women. As to the association with other organs, including the esophagus, pancreas, colorectum, kidneys, bladder, ovaries, and prostate, the results are less clear as reports reveal conflicting results or statistically nonsignificant data. Therefore, this overview does not provide broad-based conclusions. Important uncertainties include general study design, inhomogeneous patient sampling, different statistical analysis (deliberate), misreporting of socioeconomic status, education, coffee-brewing methods, consumption of caffeinated or decaffeinated coffee, smoking habits, and alcohol intake. Clearly, more epidemiologic research needs to be conducted before solid science-based recommendations can be made with regard to coffee consumption.
2.
An updated systematic review and meta-analysis on adherence to mediterranean diet and risk of cancer.
Morze, J, Danielewicz, A, Przybyłowicz, K, Zeng, H, Hoffmann, G, Schwingshackl, L
European journal of nutrition. 2021;60(3):1561-1586
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
The development of cancer is associated with a number of risk factors, including smoking, obesity, sedentary lifestyles, alcohol consumption, infections, pollution, and dietary imbalances. Based on previous research, optimal consumption of fruits, vegetables, and whole grains, along with reduced consumption of red and processed meat, reduces cancer risk. According to this systematic review and meta-analysis, adherence to the Mediterranean diet is associated with lower cancer mortality and site-specific cancer development. A Mediterranean diet includes fruits, vegetables, nuts, legumes, fish, whole grains, extra virgin olive oil, and low amounts of red meat, processed meat, egg, and dairy, along with moderate amounts of red wine. According to this systematic review and meta-analysis, adherence to the Mediterranean diet reduces the risk of cancer mortality and the risk of developing cancers specific to the site, such as colorectal cancer, bladder cancer, gastric cancer, and lung cancer. Among the components of the Mediterranean diet, fruits, vegetables, and whole grains have been shown to reduce cancer risk. Bioactive substances found in Mediterranean diet components require additional robust studies to evaluate their benefits. A healthcare professional can use the results of this study to make clinical decisions and recommend therapeutic interventions to cancer patients.
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of current systematic review was to update the body of evidence on associations between adherence to the Mediterranean diet (MedDiet) and risk of cancer mortality, site-specific cancer in the general population; all-cause, and cancer mortality as well as cancer reoccurrence among cancer survivors. METHODS A literature search for randomized controlled trials (RCTs), case-control and cohort studies published up to April 2020 was performed using PubMed and Scopus. Study-specific risk estimates for the highest versus lowest adherence to the MedDiet category were pooled using random-effects meta-analyses. Certainty of evidence from cohort studies and RCTs was evaluated using the NutriGrade scoring system. RESULTS The updated search revealed 44 studies not identified in the previous review. Altogether, 117 studies including 3,202,496 participants were enclosed for meta-analysis. The highest adherence to MedDiet was inversely associated with cancer mortality (RRcohort: 0.87, 95% CI 0.82, 0.92; N = 18 studies), all-cause mortality among cancer survivors (RRcohort: 0.75, 95% CI 0.66, 0.86; N = 8), breast (RRobservational: 0.94, 95% CI 0.90, 0.97; N = 23), colorectal (RRobservational: 0.83, 95% CI 0.76, 0.90; N = 17), head and neck (RRobservational: 0.56, 95% CI 0.44, 0.72; N = 9), respiratory (RRcohort: 0.84, 95% CI 0.76, 0.94; N = 5), gastric (RRobservational: 0.70, 95% CI 0.61, 0.80; N = 7), bladder (RRobservational: 0.87, 95% CI 0.76, 0.98; N = 4), and liver cancer (RRobservational: 0.64, 95% CI 0.54, 0.75; N = 4). Adhering to MedDiet did not modify risk of blood, esophageal, pancreatic and prostate cancer risk. CONCLUSION In conclusion, our results suggest that highest adherence to the MedDiet was related to lower risk of cancer mortality in the general population, and all-cause mortality among cancer survivors as well as colorectal, head and neck, respiratory, gastric, liver and bladder cancer risks. Moderate certainty of evidence from cohort studies suggest an inverse association for cancer mortality and colorectal cancer, but most of the comparisons were rated as low or very low certainty of evidence.
3.
Human Gut Microbiota and Gastrointestinal Cancer.
Meng, C, Bai, C, Brown, TD, Hood, LE, Tian, Q
Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics. 2018;16(1):33-49
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
In this article the authors review research on the influence of the human gut microbiota on the development and progression of gastrointestinal cancers, and go into significant detail about the molecular mechanisms involved. Helicobacter pylori is a known risk factor for gastric cancer (GC) but other dysbiotic changes in the gut microbiota are also observed in GC. On the other hand, H. pylori is associated with a decreased risk for oesophageal cancer (OC). An increase in gram-negative bacteria is associated with OC, whilst gram-positive bacteria are dominant in a healthy oesophagus. Dietary factors are associated with the risk for colorectal cancer (CRC) and may be due to their effect on the bacterial composition of the bowel. The authors explore possible mechanisms for these links. Although the liver is considered sterile, carcinogenesis can be influenced by the gut microbiota through pathogens and bacterial metabolites which can disturb metabolic pathways and immune responses in the liver. In pancreatic cancer (PC), the gut microbiota may influence carcinogenesis by promoting inflammation. In addition to various lifestyle factors, H. pylori is a risk factor for PC. The authors also review the use of prebiotics, probiotics, synbiotics (a combination of pre- and pro-biotics) and Traditional Chinese Medicine as an adjunct to conventional cancer treatment to reduce side effects, as well as their potential preventive mechanisms.
Abstract
Human gut microbiota play an essential role in both healthy and diseased states of humans. In the past decade, the interactions between microorganisms and tumors have attracted much attention in the efforts to understand various features of the complex microbial communities, as well as the possible mechanisms through which the microbiota are involved in cancer prevention, carcinogenesis, and anti-cancer therapy. A large number of studies have indicated that microbial dysbiosis contributes to cancer susceptibility via multiple pathways. Further studies have suggested that the microbiota and their associated metabolites are not only closely related to carcinogenesis by inducing inflammation and immune dysregulation, which lead to genetic instability, but also interfere with the pharmacodynamics of anticancer agents. In this article, we mainly reviewed the influence of gut microbiota on cancers in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract (including esophageal, gastric, colorectal, liver, and pancreatic cancers) and the regulation of microbiota by diet, prebiotics, probiotics, synbiotics, antibiotics, or the Traditional Chinese Medicine. We also proposed some new strategies in the prevention and treatment of GI cancers that could be explored in the future. We hope that this review could provide a comprehensive overview of the studies on the interactions between the gut microbiota and GI cancers, which are likely to yield translational opportunities to reduce cancer morbidity and mortality by improving prevention, diagnosis, and treatment.
4.
Dietary inflammatory index and risk of pancreatic cancer in an Italian case-control study.
Shivappa, N, Bosetti, C, Zucchetto, A, Serraino, D, La Vecchia, C, Hébert, JR
The British journal of nutrition. 2015;113(2):292-8
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Pancreatic cancer has the highest mortality rate amongst gastro-intestinal cancers and evidence suggests that diet plays a pivotal role in the aetiology of the disease. Chronic inflammation is often present with cancers however it is not known if inflammation has a causal role or is simply part of the body’s natural response mechanism. This 2015 case control study evaluated food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) data from 326 incident cases and 652 controls and indexed foods based on their inflammatory status using a global database derived from previous studies: the dietary inflammatory index (DII). The DII ranks foods against forty-five nutrient parameters to generate an overall score. The higher DII scores reflect a greater pro-inflammatory potential of the diet. Food parameters measured included: carbohydrate; protein; fat; alcohol; fibre; cholesterol; SFA; MUFA; PUFA; n -3; n -6; niacin; thiamin; riboflavin; vitamin B6; Fe; Zn; vitamin A; vitamin C; vitamin D; vitamin E; folic acid; β-carotene; anthocyanidins; flavan-3-ol; flavonol; flavonones; flavones; isoflavones; caffeine and tea. The DII is designed to consider all pro-inflammatory foods (such as red meat) and all anti-inflammatory foods (such as fruits and vegetables) to represent the potential inflammatory effect of diet as a whole. After adjustments for sex, age and other lifestyle factors the results showed that subjects with higher DII scores (i.e. representing a more pro-inflammatory diet) had a higher risk of developing pancreatic cancer.
Abstract
Previous studies have shown that various dietary components may be implicated in the aetiology of pancreatic cancer. However, the possible relationship between diet-related inflammation and the risk of pancreatic cancer has not yet been investigated. We examined the ability of a newly developed literature-derived dietary inflammatory index (DII) to predict the risk of pancreatic cancer in a case-control study conducted in Italy between 1991 and 2008. This included 326 incident cases and 652 controls admitted to the major teaching and general hospitals for non-neoplastic diseases, frequency-matched to cases by study centre, sex and age. The DII was computed based on dietary intake assessed using a validated and reproducible seventy-eight-item FFQ. Logistic regression models were used to estimate multivariable OR adjusted for age, sex, study centre, education, BMI, smoking status, alcohol drinking and history of diabetes. Energy adjustment was performed using the residual method. Subjects with higher DII scores (i.e., representing a more pro-inflammatory diet) had a higher risk of pancreatic cancer, with the DII being used as both a continuous variable (ORcontinuous 1.24, 95% CI 1.11, 1.38) and a categorical variable (i.e., compared with the subjects in the lowest quintile of the DII, those in the second, third, fourth and fifth quintiles had, respectively, OR(quintile2 v. 1) 1.70, 95% CI 1.02, 2.80; OR(quintile3 v. 1) 1.91, 95% CI 1.16, 3.16; OR(quintile4 v. 1) 1.98, 95% CI 1.20, 3.27; OR(quintile5 v. 1) 2.48, 95% CI 1.50, 4.10; P trend= 0.0015). These data suggest that a pro-inflammatory diet increases the risk of pancreatic cancer.
5.
Risk factors for pancreatic cancer: a summary review of meta-analytical studies.
Maisonneuve, P, Lowenfels, AB
International journal of epidemiology. 2015;44(1):186-98
-
-
-
Plain language summary
Pancreatic cancer (PC) is one of the four or five most common causes of cancer mortality in developed countries. The aim of this review was to summarize results from pooled analyses and meta-analyses to estimate the fraction of PCs attributable to many different risk factors. A comprehensive review of the literature was carried out by searching for meta-analytical studies on the association between specific risk factors and PC risk or multiple cancer sites. Results indicate that PC has a multifactorial aetiology. All identified factors can be combined into a specific aetiological (the philosophy or study of causation) pathway for PC. The main pathways include insulin resistance (central adiposity, diabetes, metabolic syndrome), inflammation (tobacco, alcohol, pancreatitis), DNA damage (tobacco, red meat) and haemostasis (blood group, history of thrombosis). Authors conclude that about two-thirds of the major risk factors associated with PC are potentially modifiable, affording a unique opportunity for preventing one of our deadliest cancers.
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aetiology of pancreatic cancer (PC) has been extensively studied and is the subject of numerous meta-analyses and pooled analyses. We have summarized results from these pooled and meta-analytical studies to estimate the fraction of PCs attributable to each of the identified risk factors. METHODS Using a comprehensive strategy, we retrieved 117 meta-analytical or pooled reports dealing with the association between specific risk factors and PC risk. We combined estimates of relative risk and estimates of exposure to calculate the fraction of PCs caused or prevented by a particular exposure. RESULTS Tobacco smoking ('strong' evidence) and Helicobacter pylori infection ('moderate' evidence) are the major risk factors associated with PC, with respective estimated population attributable fractions of 11-32% and 4-25%. The major protective factors are history of allergy ('strong' evidence) and increasing fruit or folate intake ('moderate' evidence), with respective population preventable fractions of 3-7% and 0-12%. CONCLUSIONS We summarized results of 117 meta-analytical or pooled data reports dealing with 37 aetiological exposures, to obtain robust information about the suspected causes of PC. By combining these estimates with their prevalences in the population, we calculated population attributable or population preventable fractions. About two-thirds of the major risk factors associated with PC are potentially modifiable, affording a unique opportunity for preventing one of our deadliest cancers.